AMD A10-7700K vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Comparative analysis of AMD A10-7700K and Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-7700K
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 42% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1427 vs 1145
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3199 vs 1140
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 461 vs 368
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1337 vs 612
- 15.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.9 vs 0.322
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.292 vs 0.1
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.752 vs 0.685
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.727 vs 2.463
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 January 2014 vs January 2008 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 2.67 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 45 nm |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1427 vs 1145 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3199 vs 1140 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 461 vs 368 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1337 vs 612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.9 vs 0.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.292 vs 0.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.752 vs 0.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.727 vs 2.463 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 27.206 vs 19.008
Specifications (specs) | |
L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 4 MB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.206 vs 19.008 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A10-7700K
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD A10-7700K | Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1427 | 1145 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3199 | 1140 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 461 | 368 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1337 | 612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.9 | 0.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.008 | 27.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.292 | 0.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.752 | 0.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.727 | 2.463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 919 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5312 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 919 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5312 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A10-7700K | Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Kaveri | Wolfdale |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
Launch date | 14 January 2014 | January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $152 | |
OPN PIB | AD770KXBJABOX | |
OPN Tray | AD770KXBI44JA | |
Place in performance rating | 2063 | 3105 |
Series | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Processor Number | E8200 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.13 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.4 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
Compute Cores | 10 | |
Die size | 245 mm | 107 mm2 |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 6144 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 72 °C |
Maximum core temperature | 72.40°C | 72.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Transistor count | 2410 Million | 410 million |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 720 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 384 | |
Number of pipelines | 384 | |
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
Switchable graphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FM2+ | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |