AMD A12-9700P vs AMD A10-5757M
Comparative analysis of AMD A12-9700P and AMD A10-5757M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A12-9700P
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1211 vs 1097
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2446 vs 1932
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1934 vs 365
- 4.8x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4344 vs 901
- 11.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 104.395 vs 9.416
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.759 vs 13.138
- 22.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.779 vs 2.213
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 vs 987
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 vs 987
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1211 vs 1097 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2446 vs 1932 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1934 vs 365 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4344 vs 901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.395 vs 9.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.759 vs 13.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.779 vs 2.213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 vs 987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 vs 987 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5757M
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.665 vs 2.183
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 vs 0.129
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2108 vs 1596
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7817 vs 4124
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2108 vs 1596
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7817 vs 4124
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.665 vs 2.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.561 vs 0.129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2108 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7817 vs 4124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2108 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7817 vs 4124 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A12-9700P
CPU 2: AMD A10-5757M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A12-9700P | AMD A10-5757M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1211 | 1097 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2446 | 1932 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1934 | 365 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4344 | 901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.183 | 2.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.395 | 9.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.129 | 0.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.759 | 13.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.779 | 2.213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 | 987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 2108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4124 | 7817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 | 987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 2108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4124 | 7817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A12-9700P | AMD A10-5757M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge | Richland |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 | 23 May 2013 |
| OPN Tray | AM970PADY44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 1435 | 1432 |
| Series | AMD A12-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A-Series |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.5 GHz | |
| Die size | 250 mm | 246 mm |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 3100 Million | 1178 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 758 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 6 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
| Sockets supported | FP4 | BGA |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A12-9700P with others
AMDA12-9700P vs
IntelCore i5-6198DU
AMDA12-9700P vs
AMDA9-9425
AMDA12-9700P vs
IntelXeon E3-1505L v5
AMDA12-9700P vs
AMDEPYC 3201
AMDA12-9700P vs
IntelCore i7-9850HL
AMDA12-9700P vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
