AMD EPYC 3201 vs AMD A12-9700P

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 3201 and AMD A12-9700P processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 3201

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
• 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
• Around 91076% higher clock speed: 3100 MHz vs 3.4 GHz
• Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 95 °C vs 90°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1564 vs 1217
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 8672 vs 2424

Reasons to consider the AMD A12-9700P

• 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC 3201
CPU 2: AMD A12-9700P

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1564 1217
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	8672 2424

Compare specifications (specs)