AMD A12-9800E vs AMD A4-5300
Comparative analysis of AMD A12-9800E and AMD A4-5300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A12-9800E
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1617 vs 1338
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3471 vs 1363
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 494 vs 425
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1441 vs 638
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1156 vs 355
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1156 vs 355
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2016 vs 26 September 2012 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1617 vs 1338 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3471 vs 1363 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 494 vs 425 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1441 vs 638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1156 vs 355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1156 vs 355 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-5300
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1572 vs 897
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3405 vs 2623
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1572 vs 897
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3405 vs 2623
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1572 vs 897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3405 vs 2623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1572 vs 897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3405 vs 2623 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A12-9800E
CPU 2: AMD A4-5300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A12-9800E | AMD A4-5300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1617 | 1338 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3471 | 1363 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 494 | 425 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1441 | 638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1156 | 355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 897 | 1572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2623 | 3405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1156 | 355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 897 | 1572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2623 | 3405 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A12-9800E | AMD A4-5300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge | Trinity |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
Launch date | 5 September 2016 | 26 September 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $105 | |
OPN PIB | AD9800AHABBOX | |
OPN Tray | AD9800AHM44AB | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Place in performance rating | 1930 | 1906 |
Price now | $113.99 | |
Series | AMD A12-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A-Series (Desktop) |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.19 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | |
Compute Cores | 12 | |
Die size | 246 mm | 246 mm |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2048 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 70 °C |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
Transistor count | 1178 million | 1303 Million |
Unlocked | ||
L1 cache | 160 KB | |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 8 | |
Processor graphics | Radeon R7 Series | |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM4 | FM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 x8 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |