AMD A4-1200 vs AMD E-450
Comparative analysis of AMD A4-1200 and AMD E-450 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-1200
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 3.9 Watt vs 18 Watt
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 559 vs 124
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 891 vs 226
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs 22 August 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 3.9 Watt vs 18 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 559 vs 124 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 891 vs 226 |
Reasons to consider the AMD E-450
- Around 65% higher clock speed: 1.65 GHz vs 1 GHz
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 497 vs 304
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 436 vs 375
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 296 vs 238
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 984 vs 611
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2135 vs 1227
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 296 vs 238
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 984 vs 611
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2135 vs 1227
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.65 GHz vs 1 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 497 vs 304 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 436 vs 375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 vs 238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 984 vs 611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2135 vs 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 vs 238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 984 vs 611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2135 vs 1227 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A4-1200
CPU 2: AMD E-450
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A4-1200 | AMD E-450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 304 | 497 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 375 | 436 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 559 | 124 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 891 | 226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 238 | 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 611 | 984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1227 | 2135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 238 | 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 611 | 984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1227 | 2135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.512 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0.98 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.037 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.716 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.395 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A4-1200 | AMD E-450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Temash | Zacate |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 | 22 August 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 2867 | 2903 |
Series | AMD A-Series | AMD E-Series |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 246 mm | 75 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 1 GHz | 1.65 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 1178 million | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FT3 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 3.9 Watt | 18 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |