AMD A4-3300M vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3300M and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3300M

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 790 vs 728
• Around 17% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 257 vs 219
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 471 vs 377

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000

• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1084 vs 714

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-3300M
CPU 2: Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	790 728
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	714 1084
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	257 219
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	471 377

Compare specifications (specs)