AMD A4-4000 vs AMD A10-5800B
Comparative analysis of AMD A4-4000 and AMD A10-5800B processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-4000
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
Launch date | June 2013 vs October 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5800B
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 27% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1579 vs 1133
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3034 vs 1146
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 525 vs 359
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1512 vs 525
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1579 vs 1133 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3034 vs 1146 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 525 vs 359 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1512 vs 525 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A4-4000
CPU 2: AMD A10-5800B
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD A4-4000 | AMD A10-5800B |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1133 | 1579 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1146 | 3034 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 359 | 525 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 525 | 1512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.915 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.86 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.096 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.774 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.385 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2039 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2039 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4280 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A4-4000 | AMD A10-5800B | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Richland | Trinity |
Launch date | June 2013 | October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 2132 | 2135 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 246 mm | 246 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | 74 °C |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1178 million | 1178 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FM2 | FM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |