AMD A6-3400M vs Intel Core i5-2415M
Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3400M and Intel Core i5-2415M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3400M
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.336 vs 1.664
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.256 vs 0.194
- 8.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.05 vs 0.722
- 12.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.526 vs 1.871
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 June 2011 vs 20 February 2011 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.336 vs 1.664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.256 vs 0.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.05 vs 0.722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.526 vs 1.871 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-2415M
- Around 26% higher clock speed: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1198 vs 702
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1932 vs 1218
- Around 91% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 442 vs 232
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 956 vs 721
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 27.27 vs 8.347
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1198 vs 702 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1932 vs 1218 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 442 vs 232 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 956 vs 721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.27 vs 8.347 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A6-3400M
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-2415M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A6-3400M | Intel Core i5-2415M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 702 | 1198 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1218 | 1932 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 232 | 442 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 721 | 956 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.336 | 1.664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.347 | 27.27 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.256 | 0.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.05 | 0.722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.526 | 1.871 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 529 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 529 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A6-3400M | Intel Core i5-2415M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Llano | Sandy Bridge |
| Launch date | 15 June 2011 | 20 February 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 2904 | 2969 |
| Series | AMD A-Series | Intel Core i5 |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 218 mm | 149 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1000 Million | 624 Million |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FS1 | BGA1023 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||