AMD A6-3500 vs AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3500 and AMD Phenom II X6 1045T processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3500
- CPU is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 19.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.184 vs 0.376
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 26.895 vs 5.413
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | August 2011 vs September 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.184 vs 0.376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 26.895 vs 5.413 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 3
- Around 52% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1282 vs 965
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3238 vs 1438
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1915 vs 307
- 9.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 7420 vs 770
- 19.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.255 vs 0.267
- 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 14.359 vs 1.595
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.277 vs 0.083
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 3 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB vs 128 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1282 vs 965 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3238 vs 1438 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1915 vs 307 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7420 vs 770 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.255 vs 0.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14.359 vs 1.595 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.277 vs 0.083 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A6-3500
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A6-3500 | AMD Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 965 | 1282 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1438 | 3238 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 307 | 1915 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 770 | 7420 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.267 | 5.255 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.595 | 14.359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.083 | 0.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.184 | 0.376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 26.895 | 5.413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4450 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4450 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A6-3500 | AMD Phenom II X6 1045T | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Llano | Thuban |
| Launch date | August 2011 | September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 2256 | 2237 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD Phenom | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $175 | |
| OPN PIB | HDT45TWFGRBOX | |
| OPN Tray | HDT45TWFK6DGR | |
| Price now | $175 | |
| Series | AMD Phenom II X6 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.11 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 228 mm | 346 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 3 | 6 |
| Transistor count | 1178 million | 904 million |
| Base frequency | 2.7 GHz | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 71°C | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FM1 | AM3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
