AMD A6-5400K vs AMD FX-6130

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-5400K and AMD FX-6130 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-5400K

• Around 78% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6130

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1390 vs 1267
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4353 vs 1276

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-5400K
CPU 2: AMD FX-6130

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1267 1390
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1276 4353

Compare specifications (specs)