AMD A6-7400K vs AMD A10-5800K
Comparative analysis of AMD A6-7400K and AMD A10-5800K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-7400K
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 28.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.806 vs 0.594
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 vs 1020
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 1020
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.806 vs 0.594 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1162 vs 1020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1162 vs 1020 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5800K
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1492 vs 1446
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2954 vs 1656
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 523 vs 437
- 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1469 vs 724
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.37 vs 2.362
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 9.891 vs 2.939
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.206 vs 0.108
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.484 vs 2.4
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2453 vs 1842
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5148 vs 3346
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2453 vs 1842
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5148 vs 3346
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1492 vs 1446 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2954 vs 1656 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 523 vs 437 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1469 vs 724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.37 vs 2.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.891 vs 2.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.206 vs 0.108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.484 vs 2.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2453 vs 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5148 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2453 vs 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5148 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A6-7400K
CPU 2: AMD A10-5800K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A6-7400K | AMD A10-5800K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1446 | 1492 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1656 | 2954 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 437 | 523 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 724 | 1469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.362 | 4.37 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.939 | 9.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.108 | 0.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.806 | 0.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.4 | 3.484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1162 | 1020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 2453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 5148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1162 | 1020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 2453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 5148 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A6-7400K | AMD A10-5800K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | AD740KYBJABOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD740KYBI23JA | |
| Place in performance rating | 1915 | 1887 |
| Series | AMD A6-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A-Series (Desktop) |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architecture codename | Trinity | |
| Launch date | 26 September 2012 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $122 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | |
| Compute Cores | 6 | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 70°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 4 | |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 246 mm | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Transistor count | 1303 Million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 758 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 256 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
| Sockets supported | FM2+ | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
