AMD A8-3800 vs AMD Sempron 3200+

Comparative analysis of AMD A8-3800 and AMD Sempron 3200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3800

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
• Around 33% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 90 nm
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 32x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1066 vs 456
• 8.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2049 vs 251
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1184 vs 826

Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3200+

• Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 875 vs 338

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A8-3800
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3200+

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1066 456
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2049 251
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	338 875
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1184 826

Compare specifications (specs)