AMD A8-7050 vs AMD A10-9600P

Comparative analysis of AMD A8-7050 and AMD A10-9600P processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-7050

• Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100 °C vs 90°C
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.049 vs 2.935
• 41.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 217.952 vs 5.264
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.619 vs 0.147

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9600P

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A8-7050
CPU 2: AMD A10-9600P

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	6.049 2.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	217.952 5.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.619 0.147

Compare specifications (specs)