AMD A9-9425 vs AMD A10-5750M
Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9425 and AMD A10-5750M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9425
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1319 vs 1164
- 5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2034 vs 405
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3077 vs 1054
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.781 vs 3.441
- 15.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 112.324 vs 7.451
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.615 vs 0.148
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.577 vs 11.627
- 21.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.717 vs 1.908
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 943 vs 583
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 943 vs 583
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1319 vs 1164 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 vs 405 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 vs 1054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 vs 3.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.324 vs 7.451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.615 vs 0.148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.577 vs 11.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 vs 1.908 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 943 vs 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 943 vs 583 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5750M
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2050 vs 1513
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2277 vs 1243
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7416 vs 3556
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2277 vs 1243
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7416 vs 3556
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2050 vs 1513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2277 vs 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7416 vs 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2277 vs 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7416 vs 3556 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A9-9425
CPU 2: AMD A10-5750M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A9-9425 | AMD A10-5750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1319 | 1164 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1513 | 2050 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 | 405 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 | 1054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 | 3.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.324 | 7.451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.615 | 0.148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.577 | 11.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 | 1.908 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 943 | 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1243 | 2277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3556 | 7416 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 943 | 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1243 | 2277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3556 | 7416 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A9-9425 | AMD A10-5750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Richland |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 2Q18 | 12 March 2013 |
| OPN Tray | AM9425AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 1562 | 1618 |
| Series | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A-Series |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Die size | 124 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 71 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | 1178 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Number of threads | 4 | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Sockets supported | FS1r2 | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A9-9425 with others
AMDA9-9425 vs
AMDA10-5750M
AMDA9-9425 vs
IntelCore i5-6198DU
AMDA9-9425 vs
AMDA4-9120
AMDA9-9425 vs
IntelXeon E5-4628L v4
AMDA9-9425 vs
IntelCore i7-6822EQ
AMDA9-9425 vs
AMDRX-427BB
