AMD Athlon 300U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 300U and AMD Ryzen 5 2500U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Peripherals, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 300U

• Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 95°C

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
• Around 9% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
• Around 99% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1816 vs 1774
• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6535 vs 3867

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 300U
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1774 1816
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3867 6535

Compare specifications (specs)