AMD Athlon 64 3200+ vs AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 3200+ and AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Athlon 64 3200+

AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Around 34% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 577 vs 430
Around 75% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 491 vs 281

Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	577 vs 430
PassMark - CPU mark	491 vs 281

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 77 Watt vs 89 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	77 Watt vs 89 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 3200+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 3200+

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

577

430

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

491

281

Name	AMD Athlon 64 3200+	AMD Athlon XP 3200+
PassMark - Single thread mark	577	430
PassMark - CPU mark	491	281
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	196
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	0.26

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Athlon 64 3200+	AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Essentials
Architecture codename	Clawhammer	Barton
Launch date	January 2001	January 2001
Launch price (MSRP)	$150
Place in performance rating	3244	3119
Price now	$149.95
Value for money (0-100)	0.97
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	193 mm	101 mm
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	512 KB
Manufacturing process technology	130 nm	130 nm
Maximum frequency	2.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
Number of cores	1	1
Transistor count	105 million	63 million
Compatibility
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Sockets supported	754	A
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	89 Watt	77 Watt