AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 vs AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 and AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 104 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 430 vs 404
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2007 vs October 2004 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 104 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 430 vs 404 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 505 vs 489
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 505 vs 489 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 | AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 489 | 505 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 430 | 404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 | AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Windsor | San Diego |
Launch date | October 2007 | October 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 3011 | 2996 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $180 | |
Price now | $179.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.18 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 230 mm | 115 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 227 million | 114 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 104 Watt |