Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 and AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1216 vs 489
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2349 vs 430
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 90 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 vs 489 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2349 vs 430 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 | 489 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2349 | 430 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Windsor |
| Launch date | Q1'08 | October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 3027 | 3021 |
| Processor Number | Q9550 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 214 mm2 | 230 mm |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | |
| Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 820 million | 227 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | AM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||