AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 vs AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 and AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660

  • CPU is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 27% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 130 nm
  • Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 77 Watt
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 416 vs 281
Specifications (specs)
Launch date May 2008 vs January 2001
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 130 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 77 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 416 vs 281

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 430 vs 428

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 3200+

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
428
430
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
416
281
Name AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 AMD Athlon XP 3200+
PassMark - Single thread mark 428 430
PassMark - CPU mark 416 281

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Essentials

Architecture codename Lima Barton
Launch date May 2008 January 2001
Place in performance rating 3103 3108
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 77 mm 101 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz 2.2 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 122 million 63 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM2 A
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 77 Watt