AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 vs AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 and AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660

AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660

CPU is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 27% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 130 nm
Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 77 Watt
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 416 vs 281

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	May 2008 vs January 2001
Maximum frequency	2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm vs 130 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 77 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark	416 vs 281

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 3200+

Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	430 vs 428

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 3200+

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

428

430

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

416

281

Name	AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660	AMD Athlon XP 3200+
PassMark - Single thread mark	428	430
PassMark - CPU mark	416	281

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660	AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Essentials
Architecture codename	Lima	Barton
Launch date	May 2008	January 2001
Place in performance rating	3102	3107
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	77 mm	101 mm
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	512 KB
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	130 nm
Maximum frequency	2.8 GHz	2.2 GHz
Number of cores	1	1
Transistor count	122 million	63 million
Compatibility
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Sockets supported	AM2	A
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	77 Watt