AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs AMD Opteron X2 185
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and AMD Opteron X2 185 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 110 Watt
Launch date | May 2006 vs March 2006 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 185
- Around 18% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
CPU 2: AMD Opteron X2 185
Name | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | AMD Opteron X2 185 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1285 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 219 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 398 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | AMD Opteron X2 185 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Manchester | Denmark |
Launch date | May 2006 | March 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $309 | |
Place in performance rating | 3318 | not rated |
Price now | $179.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.80 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 156 mm | |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 154 million | 233 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Sockets supported | 939 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt | 110 Watt |