AMD Athlon II X2 215 vs AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X2 215 and AMD Athlon 64 3000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 215
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 35% higher clock speed: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 89 Watt
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1023 vs 549
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 973 vs 463
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2009 vs December 2003 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1023 vs 549 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 973 vs 463 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3000+
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 850 vs 327
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 834 vs 597
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 850 vs 327 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 834 vs 597 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X2 215
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3000+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X2 215 | AMD Athlon 64 3000+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1023 | 549 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 973 | 463 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 327 | 850 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 597 | 834 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X2 215 | AMD Athlon 64 3000+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Regor | Clawhammer |
Launch date | October 2009 | December 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $45 | $65 |
Place in performance rating | 2697 | 2691 |
Price now | $11.99 | $74.95 |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.69 | 1.82 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 117 mm | 193 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 69 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | 754 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |