AMD Athlon II X2 240 vs AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X2 240 and AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 240
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1080 vs 428
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1042 vs 416
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | July 2009 vs May 2008 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1080 vs 428 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1042 vs 416 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X2 240 | AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1080 | 428 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1042 | 416 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 338 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.699 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.093 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.779 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X2 240 | AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Regor | Lima |
Launch date | July 2009 | May 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $35 | |
Place in performance rating | 3099 | 3102 |
Price now | $15.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.24 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 117 mm | 77 mm |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 122 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |