AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X2 250 and AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 250
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Launch date | June 2009 vs February 2009 |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.161 vs 0.089
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 3 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.161 vs 0.089 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X2 250
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X2 250 | AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1197 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1160 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 642 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.343 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.089 | 0.161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.714 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X2 250 | AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Regor | Heka |
Launch date | June 2009 | February 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39 | |
Place in performance rating | 3193 | 3211 |
Price now | $189.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.70 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 117 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 3 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 758 million |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |