AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs Intel Pentium III 1400
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X2 250 and Intel Pentium III 1400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 250
- CPU is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 114% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
- 32x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1198 vs 272
- 6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1165 vs 193
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | June 2009 vs December 2001 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 1.4 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 130 nm |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 8 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 256 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1198 vs 272 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1165 vs 193 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium III 1400
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 31.2 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31.2 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X2 250
CPU 2: Intel Pentium III 1400
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X2 250 | Intel Pentium III 1400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1198 | 272 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1165 | 193 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 642 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.343 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.714 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X2 250 | Intel Pentium III 1400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Regor | Tualatin |
Launch date | June 2009 | December 2001 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39 | |
Place in performance rating | 3194 | 3256 |
Price now | $189.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.70 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 117 mm | 80 mm2 |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 8 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 44 million |
Base frequency | 1.40 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 133 MHz FSB | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 69°C | |
VID voltage range | 1.5V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | PPGA370 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 31.2 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |