AMD Athlon II X2 260 vs AMD Phenom II X2 B55
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X2 260 and AMD Phenom II X2 B55 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 260
- CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1265 vs 1205
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2010 vs October 2009 |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1265 vs 1205 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1208 vs 1204 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X2 B55
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1851 vs 369
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2854 vs 651
Specifications (specs) | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1851 vs 369 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2854 vs 651 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X2 260
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X2 B55
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X2 260 | AMD Phenom II X2 B55 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1265 | 1205 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1208 | 1204 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 369 | 1851 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 651 | 2854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.707 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.41 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.318 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.556 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X2 260 | AMD Phenom II X2 B55 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Regor | Callisto |
Launch date | May 2010 | October 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $48 | $48 |
Place in performance rating | 2506 | 2507 |
Price now | $19.99 | $48 |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.59 | 11.85 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 117 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 758 million |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 80 Watt |