AMD Athlon II X3 425 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X3 425 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X3 425
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1087 vs 746
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1587 vs 653
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | October 2009 vs April 2008 |
| Number of cores | 3 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1087 vs 746 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1587 vs 653 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X3 425
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon II X3 425 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1087 | 746 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1587 | 653 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 320 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon II X3 425 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Rana | Brisbane |
| Launch date | October 2009 | April 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $42 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2647 | 2650 |
| Price now | $26.99 | $24.99 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.22 | 18.01 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 169 mm | 126 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 3 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 300 million | 154 million |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 89 Watt |
