AMD Athlon II X3 435 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X3 435 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X3 435
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
- 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1630 vs 1206
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 997 vs 738
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.146 vs 0.33
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.136 vs 0.099
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.867 vs 2.408
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2009 vs January 2008 |
Number of cores | 3 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1630 vs 1206 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 997 vs 738 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.146 vs 0.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.136 vs 0.099 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.867 vs 2.408 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1237 vs 1166
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 422 vs 370
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 vs 6.968
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz |
L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1237 vs 1166 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 422 vs 370 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.311 vs 6.968 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X3 435
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X3 435 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1166 | 1237 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1630 | 1206 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 370 | 422 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 997 | 738 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.146 | 0.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.968 | 26.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.136 | 0.099 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.867 | 2.408 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2400 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X3 435 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Rana | Wolfdale |
Launch date | October 2009 | January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Place in performance rating | 2982 | 2971 |
Price now | $29.99 | $129.95 |
Value for money (0-100) | 24.28 | 4.87 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | E8400 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 169 mm | 107 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6144 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz | 3 GHz |
Number of cores | 3 | 2 |
Transistor count | 300 million | 410 million |
Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 72.4°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |