AMD Athlon II X3 440 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X3 440 and Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X3 440
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
- 6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1719 vs 1150
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 942 vs 702
- 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.184 vs 0.333
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.124 vs 0.087
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.984 vs 2.414
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2010 vs May 2009 |
| Number of cores | 3 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1719 vs 1150 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 942 vs 702 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.184 vs 0.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.124 vs 0.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.984 vs 2.414 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
- Around 2% higher clock speed: 3.07 GHz vs 3 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1260 vs 1193
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 400 vs 364
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18.756 vs 6.176
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.68 vs 0.276
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.07 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1260 vs 1193 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 400 vs 364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.756 vs 6.176 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.68 vs 0.276 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X3 440
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon II X3 440 | Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1193 | 1260 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1719 | 1150 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 364 | 400 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 942 | 702 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.184 | 0.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.176 | 18.756 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.124 | 0.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.276 | 0.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.984 | 2.414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon II X3 440 | Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Rana | Wolfdale |
| Launch date | January 2010 | May 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $47 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3083 | 3069 |
| Price now | $26.99 | $119.95 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.04 | 4.84 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | E7600 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 169 mm | 82 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 3.07 GHz |
| Number of cores | 3 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 300 million | 228 million |
| Base frequency | 3.06 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||