AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs AMD Athlon 64 L110

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325 and AMD Athlon 64 L110 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

AMD Athlon 64 L110

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
1 more threads: 2 vs 1
Around 25% higher clock speed: 1.5 GHz vs 1.2 GHz
2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Around 73% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 567 vs 328
2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 556 vs 211

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 September 2009 vs 24 June 2009
Number of cores	2 vs 1
Number of threads	2 vs 1
Maximum frequency	1.5 GHz vs 1.2 GHz
L2 cache	1024 KB vs 512 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	567 vs 328
PassMark - CPU mark	556 vs 211

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 L110

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

567

328

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

556

211

Name	AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325	AMD Athlon 64 L110
PassMark - Single thread mark	567	328
PassMark - CPU mark	556	211

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325	AMD Athlon 64 L110
Essentials
Architecture codename	Congo
Launch date	10 September 2009	24 June 2009
Place in performance rating	2889	3229
Series	2x AMD Athlon Neo	AMD Athlon 64
Vertical segment	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
64 bit support
Front-side bus (FSB)	1600 MHz	800 MHz
L2 cache	1024 KB	512 KB
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm
Maximum core temperature	95 °C
Maximum frequency	1.5 GHz	1.2 GHz
Number of cores	2	1
Number of threads	2	1
Compatibility
Sockets supported	ASB1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt
Advanced Technologies
VirusProtect