AMD C-70 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-66

Comparative analysis of AMD C-70 and AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD C-70

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.809 vs 0.773

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 QL-66

• Around 65% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.33 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 751 vs 364
• 2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 641 vs 315

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD C-70
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 QL-66

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	364 751
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	315 641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.809 0.773

Compare specifications (specs)