AMD E-300 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-300

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 65536x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 20 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

• Around 23% higher clock speed: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 537 vs 394
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 577 vs 339

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	394 537
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	339 577

Compare specifications (specs)