AMD E-300 vs AMD A4-3300M

Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and AMD A4-3300M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

AMD E-300

AMD A4-3300M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-300

CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.83 vs 1.097

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 August 2011 vs 14 June 2011
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.83 vs 1.097

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3300M

Around 92% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 40 nm
2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
2x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 790 vs 394
2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 714 vs 339
2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 257 vs 104
2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 471 vs 186

Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency	2.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm vs 40 nm
L1 cache	128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB
L2 cache	2048 KB vs 1024 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	790 vs 394
PassMark - CPU mark	714 vs 339
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	257 vs 104
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	471 vs 186

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD A4-3300M

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

394

790

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

339

714

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

104

257

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

186

471

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

4.83

1.097

Name	AMD E-300	AMD A4-3300M
PassMark - Single thread mark	394	790
PassMark - CPU mark	339	714
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	104	257
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	186	471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.83	1.097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	250
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	250
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		2.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		104.466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		5.196

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD E-300	AMD A4-3300M
Essentials
Architecture codename	Zacate	Llano
Launch date	22 August 2011	14 June 2011
Place in performance rating	2920	2922
Series	AMD E-Series	AMD A-Series
Vertical segment	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	75 mm	226 mm
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	1024 KB	2048 KB
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	32 nm
Maximum frequency	1.3 GHz	2.5 GHz
Number of cores	2	2
Number of threads	2	2
Transistor count		1000 Million
Memory
Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Compatibility
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Sockets supported	FT1 BGA 413-Ball	FS1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt	35 Watt
Virtualization
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)