AMD E-450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
Comparative analysis of AMD E-450 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E-450
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.512 vs 0.26
- 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.716 vs 0.344
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 August 2011 vs 2 September 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.512 vs 0.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.716 vs 0.344 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
- Around 45% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.65 GHz
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1603 vs 497
- 8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3497 vs 436
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 298 vs 124
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 506 vs 226
- 18.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 17.798 vs 0.98
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.074 vs 0.037
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.895 vs 0.395
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.65 GHz |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1603 vs 497 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3497 vs 436 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 298 vs 124 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 506 vs 226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 17.798 vs 0.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.074 vs 0.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.895 vs 0.395 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E-450
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD E-450 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 497 | 1603 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 436 | 3497 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 124 | 298 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 226 | 506 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.512 | 0.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0.98 | 17.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.037 | 0.074 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.716 | 0.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.395 | 1.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2135 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2135 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD E-450 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zacate | Merom |
Launch date | 22 August 2011 | 2 September 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 2903 | 3001 |
Series | AMD E-Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Mobile |
Launch price (MSRP) | $307 | |
Price now | $59.95 | |
Processor Number | T7700 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.97 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | 143 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.65 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
Transistor count | 291 million | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology |