AMD E-450 vs AMD A6-3400M

Comparative analysis of AMD E-450 and AMD A6-3400M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-450

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
Launch date 22 August 2011 vs 15 June 2011
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3400M

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Around 39% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1.65 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 692 vs 498
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1193 vs 437
  • Around 87% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 232 vs 124
  • 3.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 721 vs 226
  • 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.336 vs 0.512
  • 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 8.347 vs 0.98
  • 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.256 vs 0.037
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.05 vs 2.716
  • 59.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.526 vs 0.395
  • Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 529 vs 296
  • Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 529 vs 296
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Number of threads 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 2.3 GHz vs 1.65 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 40 nm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB
L2 cache 4096 KB vs 1024 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 692 vs 498
PassMark - CPU mark 1193 vs 437
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 232 vs 124
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 721 vs 226
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.336 vs 0.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 8.347 vs 0.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.256 vs 0.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.05 vs 2.716
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.526 vs 0.395
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 529 vs 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 529 vs 296

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-450
CPU 2: AMD A6-3400M

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
498
692
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
437
1193
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
124
232
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
226
721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.512
2.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.98
8.347
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.037
0.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
2.716
6.05
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.395
23.526
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
296
529
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
296
529
Name AMD E-450 AMD A6-3400M
PassMark - Single thread mark 498 692
PassMark - CPU mark 437 1193
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 124 232
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 226 721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.512 2.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 0.98 8.347
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.037 0.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.716 6.05
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 0.395 23.526
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 296 529
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 984
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2135
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 296 529
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 984
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2135

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD E-450 AMD A6-3400M

Essentials

Architecture codename Zacate Llano
Launch date 22 August 2011 15 June 2011
Place in performance rating 2891 2892
Series AMD E-Series AMD A-Series
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 75 mm 218 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 1024 KB 4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 32 nm
Maximum frequency 1.65 GHz 2.3 GHz
Number of cores 2 4
Number of threads 2 4
Transistor count 1000 Million

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported FT1 BGA 413-Ball FS1
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)