AMD E-450 vs AMD A6-3400M
Comparative analysis of AMD E-450 and AMD A6-3400M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E-450
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
Launch date | 22 August 2011 vs 15 June 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3400M
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 39% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1.65 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 692 vs 498
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1193 vs 437
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 232 vs 124
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 721 vs 226
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.336 vs 0.512
- 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 8.347 vs 0.98
- 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.256 vs 0.037
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.05 vs 2.716
- 59.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.526 vs 0.395
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 529 vs 296
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 529 vs 296
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz vs 1.65 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 692 vs 498 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 vs 437 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 232 vs 124 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 721 vs 226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.336 vs 0.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.347 vs 0.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.256 vs 0.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.05 vs 2.716 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.526 vs 0.395 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 529 vs 296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 529 vs 296 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E-450
CPU 2: AMD A6-3400M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD E-450 | AMD A6-3400M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 498 | 692 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 437 | 1193 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 124 | 232 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 226 | 721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.512 | 2.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0.98 | 8.347 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.037 | 0.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.716 | 6.05 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.395 | 23.526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | 529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2135 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 | 529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2135 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD E-450 | AMD A6-3400M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zacate | Llano |
Launch date | 22 August 2011 | 15 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 2891 | 2892 |
Series | AMD E-Series | AMD A-Series |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | 218 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.65 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1000 Million | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FS1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |