AMD E1-1200 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-66

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-1200 and AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-1200

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 QL-66

• Around 57% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 751 vs 431
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 641 vs 382
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.773 vs 0.454
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 0.514

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-1200
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 QL-66

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	431 751
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	382 641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.454 0.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.514 1.872

Compare specifications (specs)