AMD E1-1200 vs AMD Turion 64 MT-32

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-1200 and AMD Turion 64 MT-32 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-1200

• CPU is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 90 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 25 Watt
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 430 vs 367
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 380 vs 286

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 MT-32

• Around 28% higher clock speed: 1.79 GHz vs 1.4 GHz

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-1200
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 MT-32

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	430 367
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	380 286

Compare specifications (specs)