AMD E1-2100 vs AMD Athlon 64 TF-20

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-2100 and AMD Athlon 64 TF-20 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-2100

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 25 Watt
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 406 vs 265

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 TF-20

• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 454 vs 322
• 6.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 687 vs 109
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 660 vs 183

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-2100
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 TF-20

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	322 454
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	406 265
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	109 687
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	183 660

Compare specifications (specs)