AMD E1-2100 vs AMD C-60

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-2100 and AMD C-60 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-2100

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 41% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 408 vs 290
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 109 vs 108
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.547 vs 0.467
  • Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1.584 vs 1.102
  • Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.04 vs 0.03
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.862 vs 1.801
  • 19x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.251 vs 0.487
  • 31.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 311 vs 10
  • Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1098 vs 564
  • 31.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 311 vs 10
  • Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1098 vs 564
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 May 2013 vs 22 August 2011
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 408 vs 290
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 109 vs 108
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.547 vs 0.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1.584 vs 1.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.04 vs 0.03
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.862 vs 1.801
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 9.251 vs 0.487
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 311 vs 10
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1098 vs 564
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 311 vs 10
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1098 vs 564

Reasons to consider the AMD C-60

  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 354 vs 323
  • Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 197 vs 183
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 354 vs 323
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 197 vs 183

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-2100
CPU 2: AMD C-60

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
323
354
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
408
290
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
109
108
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
183
197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.547
0.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.584
1.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.04
0.03
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.862
1.801
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
9.251
0.487
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
311
10
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1098
564
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
311
10
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1098
564
Name AMD E1-2100 AMD C-60
PassMark - Single thread mark 323 354
PassMark - CPU mark 408 290
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 109 108
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 183 197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.547 0.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1.584 1.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.04 0.03
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.862 1.801
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 9.251 0.487
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 311 10
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1098 564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1840
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 311 10
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1098 564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1840

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD E1-2100 AMD C-60

Essentials

Architecture codename Kabini Ontario
Family AMD E-Series Processors
Launch date 23 May 2013 22 August 2011
OPN Tray EM2100CJ23HM
Place in performance rating 2884 3286
Series AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops AMD C-Series
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 1 GHz
Die size 246 mm 75 mm
L2 cache 1 MB 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 90 °C
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 2
Transistor count 1178 million
Unlocked
L1 cache 128 KB
Maximum frequency 1.33 GHz

Memory

Max memory channels 1
Supported memory types Not Listed DDR3

Graphics

Enduro
Processor graphics AMD Radeon HD 8210
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI

Graphics API support

DirectX 12
Vulkan

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported FT3 FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 9 Watt 9 Watt

Peripherals

PCI Express revision 2.0

Advanced Technologies

AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
PowerGating
PowerNow
VirusProtect

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0