AMD E1-2100 versus AMD C-60
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD E1-2100 et AMD C-60 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E1-2100
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 408 versus 290
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 109 versus 108
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.547 versus 0.467
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1.584 versus 1.102
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.04 versus 0.03
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.862 versus 1.801
- 19x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.251 versus 0.487
- 31.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 311 versus 10
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1098 versus 564
- 31.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 311 versus 10
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1098 versus 564
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 May 2013 versus 22 August 2011 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 408 versus 290 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 109 versus 108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.547 versus 0.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.584 versus 1.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.04 versus 0.03 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.862 versus 1.801 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.251 versus 0.487 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 311 versus 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 versus 564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 311 versus 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 versus 564 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD C-60
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 354 versus 323
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 197 versus 183
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 354 versus 323 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 197 versus 183 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD E1-2100
CPU 2: AMD C-60
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD E1-2100 | AMD C-60 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 323 | 354 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 408 | 290 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 109 | 108 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 183 | 197 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.547 | 0.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.584 | 1.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.04 | 0.03 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.862 | 1.801 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.251 | 0.487 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 311 | 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 | 564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1840 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 311 | 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 | 564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1840 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD E1-2100 | AMD C-60 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Kabini | Ontario |
Family | AMD E-Series Processors | |
Date de sortie | 23 May 2013 | 22 August 2011 |
OPN Tray | EM2100CJ23HM | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2884 | 3286 |
Série | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops | AMD C-Series |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 1 GHz | |
Taille de dé | 246 mm | 75 mm |
Cache L2 | 1 MB | 1024 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 90 °C | |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
Compte de transistor | 1178 million | |
Ouvert | ||
Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
Fréquence maximale | 1.33 GHz | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | Not Listed | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon HD 8210 | |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Prise courants soutenu | FT3 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 9 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |