AMD E1-6010 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-6010 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-6010

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 661 vs 425
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 548 vs 535

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-6010
CPU 2: Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	425 661
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	535 548

Compare specifications (specs)