AMD E2-2000 vs AMD Mobile Sempron 210U

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-2000 and AMD Mobile Sempron 210U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-2000

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 17% higher clock speed: 1.75 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 538 vs 299
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 496 vs 267

Reasons to consider the AMD Mobile Sempron 210U

• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 18 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-2000
CPU 2: AMD Mobile Sempron 210U

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	538 299
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	496 267

Compare specifications (specs)