AMD E2-2000 vs AMD C-60

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-2000 and AMD C-60 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).

AMD E2-2000

AMD C-60

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-2000

CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 32% higher clock speed: 1.75 GHz vs 1.33 GHz
Around 52% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 538 vs 354
Around 71% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 496 vs 290
Around 19% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 129 vs 108
Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 233 vs 197
Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.578 vs 0.467
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3.575 vs 1.102
Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.044 vs 0.03
Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.017 vs 1.801
Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 0.798 vs 0.487
32.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 324 vs 10
32.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 324 vs 10

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 January 2013 vs 22 August 2011
Maximum frequency	1.75 GHz vs 1.33 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	538 vs 354
PassMark - CPU mark	496 vs 290
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	129 vs 108
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	233 vs 197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	0.578 vs 0.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3.575 vs 1.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.044 vs 0.03
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.017 vs 1.801
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	0.798 vs 0.487
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	324 vs 10
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	324 vs 10

Reasons to consider the AMD C-60

2x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 18 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	9 Watt vs 18 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-2000
CPU 2: AMD C-60

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

538

354

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

496

290

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

129

108

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

233

197

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.578

0.467

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

3.575

1.102

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.044

0.03

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

3.017

1.801

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.798

0.487

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

324

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

324

Name	AMD E2-2000	AMD C-60
PassMark - Single thread mark	538	354
PassMark - CPU mark	496	290
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	129	108
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	233	197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	0.578	0.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3.575	1.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.044	0.03
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.017	1.801
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	0.798	0.487
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	324	10
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	324	10
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		564

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD E2-2000	AMD C-60
Essentials
Architecture codename	Zacate	Ontario
Launch date	1 January 2013	22 August 2011
Place in performance rating	3264	3276
Series	AMD E-Series	AMD C-Series
Vertical segment	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	75 mm	75 mm
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1024 KB	1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	100 °C
Maximum frequency	1.75 GHz	1.33 GHz
Number of cores	2	2
Number of threads	2	2
Memory
Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Compatibility
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Sockets supported	FT1 BGA 413-Ball	FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt	9 Watt
Advanced Technologies
PowerNow
Virtualization
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)