AMD E2-3000M vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-3000M and Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3000M

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 668 vs 652
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1174 vs 1139
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1887 vs 1795

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 768 vs 731

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-3000M
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	731 768
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	668 652
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1174 1139
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1887 1795

Compare specifications (specs)