AMD EPYC 9754 vs AMD EPYC 9354
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 9754 and AMD EPYC 9354 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9754
- CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 96 more cores, run more applications at once: 128 vs 32
- 192 more threads: 256 vs 64
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4194304x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 1048576x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 130045 vs 112027
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 vs 10 Nov 2022 |
| Number of cores | 128 vs 32 |
| Number of threads | 256 vs 64 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) vs 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) vs 256MB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 130045 vs 112027 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9354
- Around 23% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 280 Watt vs 360 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2881 vs 2329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt vs 360 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2881 vs 2329 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD EPYC 9754
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9354
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD EPYC 9754 | AMD EPYC 9354 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2329 | 2881 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 130045 | 112027 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD EPYC 9754 | AMD EPYC 9354 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 | 10 Nov 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $11900 | $3420 |
| Place in performance rating | 53 | 45 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.25 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| Die size | 8x 73 mm² | 8x 72 mm² |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 256MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 128 | 32 |
| Number of threads | 256 | 64 |
| Transistor count | 71,000 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max memory channels | 12 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 320-400 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | SP5 | SP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 360 Watt | 280 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) | 5.0 |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 128 | |
