AMD FX-8370 vs Intel Celeron E1600

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8370 and Intel Celeron E1600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8370

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 2
• Around 79% higher clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 65 nm
• 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 16x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1624 vs 916
• 7.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6166 vs 840

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E1600

• Around 20% higher maximum core temperature: 73.3°C vs 61.10°C
• Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD FX-8370
CPU 2: Intel Celeron E1600

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1624 916
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	6166 840

Compare specifications (specs)