Intel Celeron J4105 vs AMD FX-8370
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J4105 and AMD FX-8370 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J4105
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 61.10°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- 12.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30 vs 21.936
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.281 vs 1.025
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs September 2014 |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 61.10°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 vs 21.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 vs 1.025 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8370
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 72% higher clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 2.50 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1624 vs 1093
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6166 vs 2905
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 576 vs 412
- 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2794 vs 1365
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.994 vs 3.374
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.413 vs 0.261
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.236 vs 2.947
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 4.3 GHz vs 2.50 GHz |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 4 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1624 vs 1093 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6166 vs 2905 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 576 vs 412 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2794 vs 1365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.994 vs 3.374 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.413 vs 0.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.236 vs 2.947 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J4105
CPU 2: AMD FX-8370
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron J4105 | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1093 | 1624 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2905 | 6166 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 576 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 | 2794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.374 | 9.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 | 21.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.261 | 0.413 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 | 1.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.947 | 7.236 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3124 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron J4105 | AMD FX-8370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Gemini Lake | Vishera |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 | September 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
Place in performance rating | 2424 | 2414 |
Price now | $107 | $129.99 |
Processor Number | J4105 | |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors |
Status | Launched | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | 20.46 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
OPN PIB | FD8370FRHKHBX | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 4 GHz |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm SOI |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 61.10°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.50 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
Die size | 315 mm | |
L1 cache | 384 KB | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | |
Transistor count | 1200 million | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s | DDR3 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
Device ID | 0x3185 | |
Execution Units | 12 | |
Graphics base frequency | 250 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | |
Max video memory | 8 GB | |
Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
MIPI-DSI | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
4K resolution support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm x 24mm | |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1090 | AM3+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 125 Watt |
Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | Wraith cooler |
Peripherals |
||
Integrated LAN | ||
Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 6 | |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
Number of USB ports | 8 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | n / a |
PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
UART | ||
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Speed Shift technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |