AMD FX-8800P vs Intel Atom E3827
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8800P and Intel Atom E3827 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8800P
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 94% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 1.75 GHz
- Around -325% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs -40°C to 110°C
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1380 vs 468
- 6.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2851 vs 463
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3132 vs 1653
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3132 vs 1653
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2015 vs October 2013 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz vs 1.75 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C vs -40°C to 110°C |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1380 vs 468 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2851 vs 463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3132 vs 1653 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3132 vs 1653 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom E3827
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 8 Watt vs 15 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 932 vs 406
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1542 vs 1133
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 8 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 932 vs 406 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1542 vs 1133 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-8800P
CPU 2: Intel Atom E3827
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FX-8800P | Intel Atom E3827 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1380 | 468 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2851 | 463 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 406 | 932 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1133 | 1542 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.374 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.785 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.482 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.544 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1206 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 858 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3132 | 1653 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1206 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 858 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3132 | 1653 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FX-8800P | Intel Atom E3827 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Carrizo | Bay Trail |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2015 | October 2013 |
| OPN Tray | FM880PAAY43KA | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 2291 | 2341 |
| Series | AMD FX-Series Processors for AIOs | Intel® Atom™ Processor E Series |
| Vertical segment | All-in-One | Embedded |
| Processor Number | E3827 | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 1.75 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | -40°C to 110°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz | 1.75 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 3100 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3L 1333 |
| ECC memory support | ||
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | 792 MHz |
| iGPU core count | 8 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Graphics base frequency | 542 MHz | |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | FP4 | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Integrated IDE | ||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| PCIe configurations | x4, x2, x1 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0, 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD FX-8800P with others
AMDFX-8800P vs
AMDAthlon II N370
AMDFX-8800P vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDFX-8800P vs
AMDA8-4555M
AMDFX-8800P vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDFX-8800P vs
AMDE2-9010
AMDFX-8800P vs
IntelCeleron 2002E
