AMD Opteron 1389 vs AMD Opteron X3216

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 1389 and AMD Opteron X3216 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Graphics, Graphics API support, Peripherals, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 1389

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 8192x more maximum memory size: 256 TB vs 32 GB

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X3216

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron 1389
CPU 2: AMD Opteron X3216

Compare specifications (specs)