AMD Opteron 252 vs Intel Xeon 2.66

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 252 and Intel Xeon 2.66 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 252

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 90 nm vs 130 nm
  • 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 75% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 760 vs 435
Specifications (specs)
Launch date February 2005 vs November 2002
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm vs 130 nm
L1 cache 128 KB vs 16 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB vs 512 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 760 vs 435

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 2.66

  • Around 2% higher clock speed: 2.66 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
  • Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 92 Watt
Maximum frequency 2.66 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 89 Watt vs 92 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron 252
CPU 2: Intel Xeon 2.66

PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
760
435
Name AMD Opteron 252 Intel Xeon 2.66
PassMark - Single thread mark 0 0
PassMark - CPU mark 760 435

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Opteron 252 Intel Xeon 2.66

Essentials

Architecture codename Troy Prestonia
Launch date February 2005 November 2002
Launch price (MSRP) $63
Place in performance rating 3245 3266
Price now $63.36
Value for money (0-100) 3.54
Vertical segment Server Server

Performance

64 bit support
L1 cache 128 KB 16 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz 2.66 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 106 million 55 million
Die size 217 mm

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 2 2
Sockets supported 940 604
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 92 Watt 89 Watt