AMD Opteron 252 vs Intel Xeon 3.06

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 252 and Intel Xeon 3.06 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 252

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 90 nm vs 130 nm
  • 16x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 92 Watt vs 97 Watt
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 760 vs 491
Specifications (specs)
Launch date February 2005 vs July 2003
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm vs 130 nm
L1 cache 128 KB vs 8 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB vs 512 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 92 Watt vs 97 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 760 vs 491

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 3.06

  • Around 18% higher clock speed: 3.07 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
Maximum frequency 3.07 GHz vs 2.6 GHz

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron 252
CPU 2: Intel Xeon 3.06

PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
760
491
Name AMD Opteron 252 Intel Xeon 3.06
PassMark - Single thread mark 0 0
PassMark - CPU mark 760 491

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Opteron 252 Intel Xeon 3.06

Essentials

Architecture codename Troy Gallatin
Launch date February 2005 July 2003
Launch price (MSRP) $63
Place in performance rating 3245 3250
Price now $63.36
Value for money (0-100) 3.54
Vertical segment Server Server

Performance

64 bit support
L1 cache 128 KB 8 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz 3.07 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 106 million 286 million
Die size 237 mm
L3 cache 2048 KB

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 2 2
Sockets supported 940 604
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 92 Watt 97 Watt